Publication Alert: The Ontological Congruency in the EU’s Data Protection and Data Processing Legislation
Insights on the (Formally) risk-based and (actually) value/rights-oriented method of regulation in the AI Act
Insights on the (Formally) risk-based and (actually) value/rights-oriented method of regulation in the AI Act
In the sixth episode of the JUST-AI JMCE podcast, Ljupcho Grozdanovski discusses with Maša Galič about surveillance, privacy, and criminal procedure in the era of 'datafication'
Populism, legitimation and AI: key challenges to the EU
Trade secrecy, informational transparency and meaningful litigant participation under the European Union's AI Liability Directive Proposal
This BSC course explores AI ethics from theory to practice, covering ethical foundations, AI's societal impact, governance, the EU’s approach to trustworthy AI, and global perspectives. Through case studies, it equips participants to apply ethical principles in real-world scenarios.
What if digitisation was a way to improve access to justice? In this fourth guest lecture, Marco Giacalone explores e-justice and online dispute resolution.
what happens when an AI system causes damage? Who is liable? Who should be? For the third guest lecture, Prof. Andrea Bertolini (Sant'Anna, Pisa) has chosen to answer these, and many other, questions.
How can one be sure AI is used in an environmental-friendly way? Is the protection of the environment included in the fundamental rights impact assessment mandated by the EU legislator in the AI Act?
For the second JUST-AI MET@ Conference, Prof. Philipp Hacker will discuss AI, climate, and Sustainability
Everything you always wanted to know about copyright and AI but were afraid to ask
In the fourth episode of the JUST-AI JMCE podcast, Ljupcho Grozdanovski discusses with Francesca Palmiotto about the use of AI in migration, asylum, and how courts should approach AI outputs.
As part of the EU New Legislative Framework, the AIA solely contains key requirements for trustworthy AI and leaves in the hands of standardisation organisations their operationalisations. Is this choice aligned with the EU political agenda and what is the legitimacy of this (meta-)regulatory strategy when it comes to the protection of fundamental rights?