JUST-AI Research Paper
The JUST-AI Research Papers are an open access, online Series, that offer a platform to researchers in law, sociology, political science, philosophy and software engineering to share their research output on specific topics related to fairness in the age of AI.
Interested authors are encouraged to submit their papers (min. 10'000 words incl. footnotes; no maximum) in English on a rolling basis or in response to our annual calls for submissions.
Review
Interested authors are invited to submit extended abstracts (max. 2 p.) and a short bio to: just.ai@uliege.be.
Received abstracts will undergo a peer review performed by the members of the JUST-AI JMCE Governance and Editorial Boards. Acceptance notifications are sent to the authors three weeks after the submission of their abstracts. Upon acceptance, authors are invited to submit the final drafts of their papers, taking into account the observations made by our reveiwers, within a period of three months after receiving the acceptance notification. Upon review of the final drafts, performed by the members of the JUST-AI JMCE Governance and Editorial Boards, the papers will be published online and disseminated within the JUST-AI JMCE network.
For more information, interested authors are invited to read the JUST-AI JMCE Editorial Guidelines.
Accepted authors are required to use the JUST-AI JMCE style sheet.
JUST-AI JMCE Editorial Guidelines
The JUST-AI Research Papers Series
The JUST-AI Themed Issues
Individual Safeguards and Fairness in Regulating AI, published in Cambridge Forum on AI: Law and Governance
This issue brings together 13 rigorous studies that analyse various facets of the interrelationship between fairness and individual safeguards in the field of AI. They do so by examining, on the one hand, the need for specific and tailor-made individual safeguards able to prevent instances of unfairness (discrimination, harm) from occurring, and, on the other hand, by clarifying the role those safeguards play in rectifying such instances, should they occur. Committed to interdisciplinarity, this issue offers important and original insights from a variety of disciplines and perspectives: that of engineers (regarding the fairness constraints that should frame the training and validation of AI systems); that of regulators (regarding AI-specific regulatory frameworks that integrate fairness into their design) and that of courts (regarding the rights and procedures that allow the achieving of fair outcomes in disputes involving AI systems).
Meet the editors...
...and discover the themed issue!
Ljupcho Grozdanovski and Jerome De Cooman, "Individual safeguards in the era of AI: Fair algorithms, fair regulation, fair procedures"
Merlin Tieleman, "Fairness in tension: A socio-technical analysis of an algorithm used to grade students"
Aimen Taimur, "Cognitive freedom and legal accountability: Rethinking the EU AI Act's theoretical approach to manipulative AI as unacceptable risk"
Soorya Balendra, "Meta's AI moderation and free speech: Ongoing challenges in the Global South"
Swaptik Chowdhury and Lisa Klautzer, "Shaping an adaptive approach to address the ambiguity of fairness in AI: Theory, framework, and illustrations"
Emmanuel Vargas Penagos, "Platforms on the hook? EU and human rights requirements for human involvement in content moderation"
Yulu Pi and Maddie Proctor, "Toward empowering AI governance with redress mechanisms"
Anastasia Karagianni, "Gender in a stereo-(gender)typical EU AI law: A feminist reading of the AI Act"
Victoria Hendrickx, "Rethinking the judicial duty to state reasons in the age of automation?"
Debabrota Basu and Udvas Das, "The Fair Game: Auditing & debiasing algorithms over time"
